Current:Home > InvestCalifornia voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls -WealthMap Solutions
California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls
View
Date:2025-04-16 21:34:26
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court on Thursday removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature.
The measure would have required voter approval for tax increases passed by the state Legislature. It also would have raised the threshold required for voter approval of certain local government tax increases to a two-thirds vote at the polls. Currently those tax increases can take affect if a simple majority of voters approve.
The measure would have applied retroactively to most tax increases approved since Jan. 1, 2022. Local governments warned that would mean they could have lost billions of dollars in revenue that had previously been approved by voters.
Newsom has opposed many tax increases during his time in office. But he sued to block this measure, saying it would harm local governments and take away the Legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
Supporters of the ballot measure argued that California has become too expensive and voters need more control over taxes. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the measure could not be enacted by ballot initiative because it “would substantially alter our basic plan of government.” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion. “The Supreme Court’s decision to take this dangerous initiative off the ballot avoids a host of catastrophic impacts, protecting billions of dollars for schools, access to reproductive health care, gun safety laws that keep students safe in classrooms, and paid family leave,” said Jonathan Underland, spokesperson for the campaign that opposed the initiative. Removing a qualified measure from the ballot before an election is rare in California, but not unprecedented. The court wrote it was necessary in this case to review the initiative because it would have potentially voided tax increases put in place after Jan. 1, 2022. That may have deprived government of some funding lawmakers were counting on.
veryGood! (736)
Related
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- From hospital, to shelter, to deadly inferno: Fleeing Palestinians lose another sanctuary in Gaza
- Bella Hadid Packs on the PDA With Cowboy Adan Banuelos After Marc Kalman Breakup
- Astros awaken: Max Scherzer stumbles, Cristian Javier shines in 8-5 ALCS Game 3 conquest
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Marine killed in homicide at Camp Lejeune; second Marine held for suspected involvement
- Michigan Gov. Whitmer's office reports breach of summer home
- US resumes deportation flights to Venezuela with more than 100 migrants on board
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Detroit casino workers launch strike for better pay and benefits
Ranking
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Prosecutors seeking to recharge Alec Baldwin in fatal shooting on Rust movie set
- Eddie George rips Tennessee State football fans for not supporting winning team: 'It hurts the kids'
- Phillies are rolling, breaking records and smelling another World Series berth
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- A bloody hate crime draws rabbis, Muslims together in mourning for slain 6-year-old boy
- What would Martha do? Martha Stewart collabs with Etsy for festive Holiday Collection
- Travis Kelce Reveals the Real Story Behind That Video of Him and Taylor Swift's Security
Recommendation
The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
How many votes are needed to win the House speaker election?
Nevada district attorney clears officers in fatal shooting of man who went on rampage with chainsaw
Southern California sheriff’s deputy shot and hospitalized in unknown condition
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Rapper Jeezy, Jeannie Mai's estranged husband, reveals 8-year battle with depression
SEC coaches are more accepting of youthful mistakes amid roster engagement in the portal era
Marine killed in homicide at Camp Lejeune; second Marine held for suspected involvement